10
NUMBER TEN
invites a closer look at Gansevoort Melville's reading notes, as preserved
in his 1837 Index Rerum now at the Berkshire Athenæum in
Pittsfield, Massachusetts. In our introductory peek, we noticed a
passion for Indians and westward orientation. Now we have also to notice
more than a dozen entries on the Spanish Conquest of Mexico from William
Robertson’s History of America. From a monumental study in four
volumes, Gansevoort transcribed a cluster of narrowly focused notes and
brief quotations, mainly devoted to Cortez and Pizarro as romantic
new-world heroes. Cortez exemplified “Courage”; “Enterprise”; “Genius”;
“Magnanimity”; “Resolution”; and “Sensibility;” Pizarro was a model of
“Fortitude” and “patience.” Notorious for their “Cruelty,” the Spaniards
in Mexico are nonetheless celebrated in Robertson’s History and
Gansevoort’s Index for “their insuperable perseverance & fortitude
in the 16th century.”
Gansevoort and his brother Herman shared the “American Hispanism” (as
Frederick S. Stimson termed it) of their generation. Herman
Melville's lifelong
appreciation of the Spanish Conquest as Romance is clearly reflected in
the 1876 epic Clarel, when the Holy Land pilgrims communally lament
that “Columbus ended earth’s romance: / No New World to mankind remains!”
(4.21: 158-9). In their Berkshire days, Melville once dressed in the mode
of a cavalier and greeted his friend Nathaniel Hawthorne in Spanish (Buenos Dias,
Amigo! or something like that). The roots of Melville’s
Spanish streak go back to the “romantic displays” of heroism recorded in
Robertson’s America, by 1837 available to Herman in the library of
the Albany Young Men’s Association and through excerpts in his brother’s
Index Rerum.
Now let us turn to the sixth installment of “Scenes
Beyond the Western Border” in the May 1852 Southern Literary Messenger
(313).

Bored by the unvarying prairie, the Captain indulges in a daydream of
Spanish glory. Our narrator’s interest in Cortez and the romance of New
World conquest closely parallels the selective emphasis in Gansevoort’s
Index on the conquistadors as human emblems of heroic virtue.
Following Robertson, both the Index and the Captain’s daydream
focus on Cortez, highlighting his defeat of Narvaez. Even more striking
is the Captain’s historically inaccurate portrayal of Cortez as a member
of the underclass. Robertson had characterized Cortez as well born, “of
noble blood” though “moderate fortune.” Where then did the Captain get
his idea of Cortez as a product of the “low classes,” an inspiring example
of relentless upward mobility?
A lingering memory, powerful but imperfect, of
Gansevoort’s 1837 Index would explain the error. The Index
holds up Pizarro, “originally a bastard & a swineherd,” not Cortez,
as the true exemplar of upward mobility fueled by “Genius.” Even the
vocabulary matches: for Gansevoort and Herman, ambitious sons of a now
deceased bankrupt, Pizarro illustrated the power of Genius to
“force its way”; the daydreaming
Captain of U. S. Dragoons unhistorically imagines Cortez as a peasant who
“forced his way” to the pinnacle of
Spanish aristocracy (emphasis mine). Gansevoort’s Index proceeds
alphabetically from the laudable “foresight, courage, etc.” of Cortez as a
great “General” to the
“Genius” of Pizarro (emphasis mine).
Under the “Genius” heading, the Index records the extraordinary
perseverance of the socially and economically disadvantaged Pizarro (“a
swineherd”). The “Genius” entry falls below the entry under “General” in
which the triumph over Narvaez by Cortez is memorialized as the supreme
illustration of his military greatness.

Cortez, Columbus, and the “Romance” of Spanish Conquest
May 1852
But the prairie does not always charm the
eye or the imagination: often its sameness and the monotony of slow
motion, lull us to dreamy thought, then, happily, we create a solitude, a
world of our own; or people it with the loved absent, or the long dead.
To-day, by an easy association, I dreamed of the old warrior explorers
from Spain—ere her glory died—of De Soto, Cortez, and others.
Hernando Cortez! What a name is there!
What hero of antiquity excelled him? None but Cæsar. His military genius
resembled Alexander’s; but—as in the comparison of our Washington with the
world’s captains—with an allowance for the scale of action and of means.
(His passage of the Delaware, and subsequent campaigns, gave indications
of what he might have done?) The master-stroke of the career of Cortez,
was his desperate march to Vera Cruz, his attack and defeat of
the braggart Narvaez and his
vastly superior numbers. Truly, his were enthusiastic genius, energy, and
constancy, beyond all proportion to what Providence implants or requires
in man in ordinary times. In the world’s story, among all wondrous
events, in Mexico alone History and Romance form an unity. And
Cortez, like Columbus, was
self-made; he forced his way over
great obstacles, with which that age heaped the paths of aspirants from
the low classes. [“Scenes Beyond the Western Border” by A Captain of U.
S. Dragoons. Southern Literary Messenger 18 (May 1852): 313.
Reprinted in Scenes and Adventures in the Army at 294-295.]
August 1852
“. . . a blind heroism of credulity! Ay, a
heroism of policy—like that of the great Cortez, who burnt, unread, the
proofs of a conspiracy, rather than embrace damning doubt.” Southern
Literary Messenger 18 (August 1852): 508; revised in Scenes and
Adventures in the Army as follows: “the great Cortez, who burnt the
proofs of a conspiracy, rather than foster damning doubt” (356).

Columbus
ended earth's romance:
No New World to mankind remains!
Clarel
4.21 (158-9)

Cortez and other Spanish Explorers in
Gansevoort Melville’s 1837 Index Rerum (Berkshire Athenaeum,
Pittsfield, Massachusetts)

Adventurers
without aid from the government of their country, laid the
foundation of the Spanish power in the New World. Robertson’s America v2
b6 sec 73 p80
Cortes
Fernando—his origin—early dissipation—Do v1 b5 sec 2 p 228
his superior abilities, winning manners &c. Do p229
Courage
remarkable of Cortes in destroying his fleet before marching to
Mexico—Do v.1 b5 sec 30 p. 245
Cruelty
of the Spaniards in
Mexico—bloody—unnecessary & revolting—
Enterprise
Cortes a fine example of enterprise mingled with & sustained by
perseverance—Robertson’s America books 4 & 5—vols. 1 & 2, particularly v2,
b5—sec 24, p17.
General
Cortes by his patience under privation, foresight, courage, &c.
proved himself a great military chief—Do v2, b5—v1, b4—Do
shown particularly in his
conflict with Cort Narvaez &
his final siege of the city of Mexico—also sec. 45-65
Genius
will force
its way—instance Pisarro—originally a bastard & a swineherd Do v2,
b6 sec3, p41
Magnanimity
surpassing effect of magnanimity & courage in Cortes, soon
after his landing
Pizarro
a bastard—destitute of education—a swineherd—Do v2 b6, sec 3.
p41—
his fortitude & patience under distress & difficulty exceeds anything
recorded in the history of the New World—Do sec 9 /p.46
assisted by Cortes—Do sec 12, p217
Military
high—Cortes a great one—see General
Resolution
bold & determined, & unconquerable of Cortes in destroying his
fleet. Do v1 b5, sec 30, p245
Sensibility
of Cortes, manifested by tears on the occasion of his dreadful losses in
retreating from Mexico. Do v2 b5 sec 19 p14
Spaniards
their insuperable perseverance & fortitude in the 16th
century

William Robertson on Pizarro (History of America, Book 6):
Pizarro was
the natural son of a gentleman of an honourable family by a very low
woman, and, according to the cruel fate which often attends the offspring
of unlawful love, had been so totally neglected in his youth by the author
of his birth, that he seems to have destined him never to rise beyond the
condition of his mother. . . . By engaging early in active life, without
any resource but his own talents and industry, and by depending on himself
alone in his struggles to emerge from obscurity, he acquired such a
thorough knowledge of affairs, and of men, that he was fitted to assume a
superior part in conducting the former, and in governing the latter. . . .
. . . No
adventurer of the age suffered hardships or encountered dangers which
equal those to which he [Pizarro] was exposed during this long period.
The patience with which he endured the one, and the fortitude with which
he surmounted the other, exceed whatever is recorded in the history of the
New World, where so many romantic displays of those virtues occur.
On “Fernando Cortes” (Book 5):
. . .
descended from a family of noble blood, but of very moderate fortune. . .
. The impetuosity of his temper, when he came to act with his equals,
insensibly abated, by being kept under restraint, and mellowed into a
cordial soldierly frankness. These qualities were accompanied with calm
prudence in concerting his schemes, with persevering vigour in executing
them, and with, what is peculiar to superior genius, the art of gaining
the confidence and governing the minds of men.
On Narvaez (Book 5):
[Narvaez] by
a public proclamation denounced Cortes and his adherents rebels and
enemies to their country. Cortes, it is probable, was not much surprised
at the untractable arrogance of
Narvaez. . . . Thus, by a series of events no less fortunate than
uncommon, Cortes not only escaped from perdition which seemed inevitable,
but when he had least reason to expect it, was placed at the head of a
thousand Spaniards, ready to follow wherever he should lead them.

Who's "the
braggart"? (March 1852):
“There is an omission, page 3. of the name
of the Spanish Commdr. who went to Vera Cruz with a very large force
commissioned to supercede Cortez; you, or Jno. T[hompson] can supply the
name:— I have not a book to refer to.
I suppose he was a ‘braggart’? ―”
[Philip St. George Cooke to
John Esten Cooke, 14 March 1852; Letters in the Cooke papers, Duke
University Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library, Durham,
North Carolina.]

In March 1852, when submitting the May installment of "Scenes Beyond the Western
Border" to the Southern Literary Messenger, Philip St. George
Cooke requested editorial help with identifying "the braggart” who opposed
Cortez. The manuscript text before him lacked the name of
Narvaez, prompting the putative author to ask that his nephew John
Esten Cooke or editor John Thompson consult a reference work and supply
the missing information. Philip St. George Cooke is obviously
puzzled by the omission and questions the aptness of the epithet braggart. In Melville’s mind, however, the word braggart
was
associated with victory over a formidable enemy and could be used to
implicitly designate a hero's mighty foe without more specifically mentioning the
foe's name. In chapter 39 of
Mardi, Melville alludes in just this way to Goliath as “the great braggart of Gath.”

