Can dozens
of books and thousands of websites and Hillary Rodham Clinton all be
wrong? Yes! Despite the confident attribution in the first
chapter of It Takes a Village (New York, 1996; reprinted 2006) and
all over the internet, Herman Melville is not the author of these
fine words:
We
cannot live for ourselves alone. Our lives are connected by a thousand
invisible threads, and along these sympathetic fibers, our actions run as
causes and return to us as results.
Simple mistake―Hillary
and the rest got the wrong Melvill(e), that's all. Falsely
attributed almost everywhere to American writer HERMAN MELVILLE
(1819-1891), the quotation above actually derives from an 1855 sermon on
“Partaking in Other Men’s Sins” by the once popular and influential London
preacher HENRY MELVILL (1798-1871).
Lots of
folks understandably love this quotation. In consequence of its huge
appeal and wide transmission, innumerable variants now exist. Hilary
Clinton’s version is distinctive for references to the “thousand invisible
threads” and “sympathetic fibers” that knit humanity. Other versions
employ the terms “thousand fibers” and “sympathetic threads” to designate
bonds among “fellow men.”
Poor Henry
Melvill! A hundred years ago, the Anglican clergyman was better
known than the American author. The compilation by Hialmer D. Gould
and Edward L. Hessenmueller entitled Best Thoughts of Best Thinkers
(Cleveland, 1904) correctly ascribed the following quotation to “Melville”
under the category of “Influence”: "We cannot live only for
ourselves. A thousand fibers connect us with our fellow men; and along
these fibers, as sympathetic threads, our actions run as causes, and they
come back to us as effects." (565)
Editors Gould and Hessenmueller
liberally quoted Hawthorne, Emerson, and Thoreau, never their contemporary
Herman Melville. Before the “Melville Revival” of the 1920’s, a citation
of Melville most likely referred to Henry Melvill, alternatively
spelled “Melville.” Thus in 1904, as the index to Best Thoughts
indicates, Melville meant “Melville, Henry.” Presumably in some
such volume, later researchers found the quote from “Melville” or
“H.
Melville” and transferred it to Herman―maybe
the only Melville they knew.
The
erroneous attribution has fooled even the most distinguished of academic
administrators. In his annual report for 2000-2001, Myles Brand,
then President of Indiana University, conventionally misattributed the
“sympathetic threads” version to that “great 19th-century
American novelist Herman Melville”:
We
cannot live only for ourselves. A thousand fibers connect us with our
fellow men (and women); and among those fibers, as sympathetic threads,
our actions run as causes, and they come back to us as effects.
<http://www.homepages.indiana.edu/011802/text/viewpoint.html>
For all the ostensible author’s
acknowledged greatness, Dr. Brand felt obliged to sneak in his parenthetical
assurance that the uncomfortably old-fashioned phrase fellow men
embraced women, too.


Old-fashioned indeed is the original context of the quotation in Melvill’s
sermon, delivered at St. Margaret’s Church, Lothbury, on Tuesday morning,
12 June 1855. Melvill, celebrated in his day as the “Evangelical
Chrysostom,” was about explicating 2 John 11 (“For he that biddeth him God
speed is partaker of his evil deeds”). Melvill's theme was not the
importance of charitable giving, but rather the awful eternal consequences
of “setting a bad example”:

"There is
not one of you whose actions do not operate on the actions of
others—operate, we mean, in the way of example. He would be insignificant
who could only destroy his own soul; but you are all, alas! of importance
enough to help also to destroy the souls of others. … Ye live not for
yourselves; ye cannot live for yourselves; a thousand fibres connect you
with your fellow-men, and along those fibres, as along sympathetic
threads, run your actions as causes, and return to you as effects."
(Penny Pulpit Sermons No. 2,365 as reprinted in Henry Melvill’s
Golden Lectures for 1855, page 454; emphasis added.)

Melvill's
exhortation has proved eminently quotable. Motivational gurus, self-help
experts, teachers, politicians, psychologists, sociologists, and
fundraisers for all kinds of charities and non-profits have cited the
preacher's words (albeit without knowing their evangelical source) as an enlightened call to social engagement.
Most recently, the notion of
interconnectedness by fibers and threads has been regarded as a startling
prophecy of business networking and blogging.
Ironically, the false attribution to
the author of Moby-Dick may have ensured the enduring
popularity of Melvill's words. Transferred to Herman Melville, the
cry for community became safely secular and, for audiences in the United
States, attractively American. One wonders though, how many of those who approve
the great writer’s wisdom would as warmly accept the great preacher's
burden of personal responsibility for the sins of others.
Herman
Melville (could he weigh in from the grave) might not disavow the fine
sentiments wrongly attributed to him. During a visit to London in
December 1849, Melville (Herman) walked over to Goswell Road to hear his
“famous namesake” Melvill (Henry) deliver a Sunday charity sermon.
Afterward the American writer confessed that he “hardly ever heard so good
a discourse before—that is from an ‘orthodox’ divine.” *

*See Melville's Journals,
ed. Howard C. Horsford (Evanston and Chicago: Northwestern University
Press and the Newberry Library, 1989), page 41.
